Research Centre for the History of Food and Drink The University of Adelaide Australia
Research Centre Home
About Us
Latest News
Events & Activities
Conferences and Call for Papers
Cookery Books as History
Membership Information
Publications
  Reviews-Recent Books
  More Book Reviews
  Bibliography
  Articles
  Reports
  Current Newsletter
  Previous Newsletters
  Film Reviews
Links
Symposium of Australian Gastronomy Archive
Centre Archives

Research Centre for the
History of Food and Drink

University of Adelaide
North Terrace
ADELAIDE SA 5005
 
Tel: +61 8 8303 5605
Fax: +61 8 8303 3443
 
Director:
Roger Haden


Newsletter Editor:
A. Lynn Martin


Administrative Assistant:
Margaret Meyler


You are here: RCHFD Home > Publications > Reports Print View

The Oxford Symposium on Food & Cookery, September 2001

Report by Barbara Santich

Each year the Oxford Symposium takes a specific topic as its theme – not that this narrows the range and diversity of the presentations – its focus this year being The Meal. The grounding of flights in USA resulted in the cancellation of approximately one-third of papers and a last-minute program re-shuffle but even so, choosing which of the two concurrent sessions to attend was as difficult as ever.

In the opening Plenary Session, in lieu of an address on “The Unhappy Meal” from Andrew Smith, Dr Theodore Zeldin attempted to tease out some preliminary ideas on the characteristics of the meal. Most of the accounts of “memorable meals” offered by symposiasts emphasised the event rather than what might have been eaten, leading Theodore to a tentative conclusion that perhaps the most important attributes of the meal related to togetherness, sociability and communication.

Some of the subsequent papers, however, challenged the assumption that these qualities define the meal, although Joy Adapon’s suggestion that eating street food in Mexico is analogous to conducting an illicit extramarital affair confirmed, at least in this culture, the link between meal, family and hearth. James Ferguson’s paper discussed the increasing prevalence and acceptance of “the one-armed meal,” eaten in solitude, in Europe and America. In Indonesia, where eating street food is totally acceptable, the cook for the household will prepare and set out in the morning the various dishes for family members to help themselves whenever they want; Indonesian family meals are typically associated with special events, to which friends and neighbours might also be invited. The Middle Eastern meal is often relatively unsociable and brief, especially if preceded by mezze (or the equivalent in other Mediterranean countries), since the sociability and conversation are associated with drink and mezze, not with the meal itself. According to Sami Zubaida, “the mezze concept is intrinsically coupled with drink. In practice, a long evening of drink and mezze was concluded with a quick supper.” Roman funerary meals, often vast quantities of wine plus the favourite dishes of the deceased, were still intended as meals even though the deceased would never eat them, much less accompany them with conversation.

Other presentations focused on particular meals in particular cultures, on changing mealtimes, on table settings and table layouts. Fiona Lucraft, for example, commented on the apparent extravagance of eighteenth- and nineteenth-century dinners served à la française, where many different dishes would be placed on the table for each service. Her research indicates that many of these dishes would appear on the table day after day, until the pie, the pudding, the potted lobsters and the collared eel were finished; the cook did not prepare fourteen different dishes each day.

In the final plenary session, Theodore Zeldin tried to bring together the many threads introduced by each of the papers in order to draw some conclusions about The Meal. But the meal seemed to resist any attempts at categorisation; as soon as one possible generality was nominated, a dozen exceptions disproved it. The family is sometimes the unifying force but sometimes the opposite. The commensality of the shared meal has a positive social value but there are also advantages to the solitary meal in a top restaurant where the diner’s total devotion to the food and drink earns the appreciation of the chef.

The Saturday dinner was an Afghan Meal, planned long before the events of September 11 – large circular platters piled high with lamb and rice pilau, spinach pilau, an unusual dish of sticky white rice with mung beans served with a lamb and sour plum stew, okra and aubergines and salad; and for dessert, a cardamom-flavoured milky pudding and pistachio icecream.

The theme for the 2002 Oxford Symposium is Fat, and for 2003 Food and Children. For information and enquiries contact the organiser, Jane Levi, at foodsymp@banksider.demon.co.uk.

Barbara Santich is a lecturer in the new postgraduate program in gastronomy at Adelaide University.